So instead of me writing about Torque, which is the concept of circular motion in unarmed combat, 360 degree security and situational awareness, and shooting in any orientation in armed combat, I am going to post a link that will piss you off. This is a live question and answer session on Reddit with Tim Larkin, who again, I strongly endorse. But, I want you to ignore Mr. Larkin and even the BJJ or Krav Maga trolls who get into stylistic stuff, instead look at the comments from the guys from the UK. The only point I will make is that they are called Subjects of the Crown for a reason:
http://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/6zo70h/iam_a_violence_expert_who_has_trained_over_10000/?limit=500
Please like and share the blog. I like to think I'm thinking thoughts that make a difference in Making America Violent Again.
Thanks,
Soule
(Easy 6)
The guy/gal named hoovegong, who seems to be a legally smart individual, espouses the fundamental problem brilliantly. He looks at violent crime from a "societal perspective." That totally is devoid of the reality that Violence is PERSONAL, not societal. So, creating policies that disarm or prevent people from defending themselves, may indeed reduce violent crime RATES, but that single, solitary victim is still dead, raped, maimed. This is the problem with all leftism, it looks at "societal rates." Screw that, I don't care if there is only one murder a year in America, which would be a huge accomplishment for the hippies afraid of violence, but the one victim is STILL DEAD, and if we create policies that prevent that person from defending themselves, than we are accessories to that death. That is what is happening in Chicago and Baltimore right now. They have the toughest gun control laws in the country, and the highest murder RATES. Each of those RATES is a bunch of dead INDIVIDUALS who weren't allowed to defend themselves. I disagree with policies that create victims so their f***ing bar graphs look better. Violence and mortality are INDIVIDUAL!
ReplyDelete