Thursday, September 13, 2018

Patenque Ball Defensive Technique

The Paris stabbings the other day highlight several lessons.  Number 1, as always, is “Sixuational Awareness.”  Check your six, be aware of your surroundings, be protective of your personal bubble.  Nobody should be getting closer than arms-length, to you.  Professor David James of Vee Arnis Jitsu calls this “The Three Foot Rule,” and there’s no reason any stranger should be closer to you than that in an unsafe place like Paris.
The second is the use of improvised weapons against the first attacker.  Before yesterday, I’d never heard of a Patenque Ball, but I commend the game’s practitioners on pelting the knife-wielding lunatic with them.  Weapon: the tool is not the weapon, you are!  When you are the Weapon, then anything can be used as a tool of self-protection.
Having said that, three, we should probably not be relying on lawn sports equipment for our personal protection in a dangerous world.  Weapon: arm yourself.  If where you live does not allow you to carry a firearm, you are living with a dramatically increased level of danger.  But if you live in such a place, you need to carry something.  Carry whatever is legal.  Carry a pocketknife with a blade the legal length allowed by your state or jurisdiction.  Carry a flat-head screw driver.  Carry a cane.  Then, most importantly, learn to use what you are allowed to carry.  If you live in a sane place like Colorado, get a concealed carry permit and a handgun.  Part of “Sixuational Awareness” and being the Weapon is always having those tools at your disposal.  I tell people to treat them like a watch: you put them on in the morning, take them off only when you get into the shower, and put them on your nightstand when you go to bed.  The tool should never be farther than arms-length, away from you.
The last lesson is related to the “Patenque Ball Defensive Technique” also.  They did not try to wrestle the knife out of the guy’s hand.  They beamed him with heavy metal balls.  They attacked the attacker, not the bad guy’s tools.  This is about Damage: you have to hurt, incapacitate or kill the brain box of the bad guy to stop him, not the inanimate objects his brain is animating.  Focusing on deflecting or blocking or retreating from the knife once you are engaged are all losing bets.  Now, if you aren’t yet engaged and you have an escape route, run for it, but if you are engaged, you have to ATTACK!  Take the Initiative, gouge out his eyes, stomp on his throat, snap his neck, rip his ears off, or do whatever it takes to eliminate the enemy weapon system.  The enemy Weapon IS NOT THE KNIFE, it’s his brain.  The best way to shut his brain down, by the way, is to empty a firearm into his chest or head.
Like and Share!
Soule (Easy 6)

Saturday, August 25, 2018

Mary Interviewing Little Lambs


This would be hilarious if it was not so scary.  It highlights the dangerous misconceptions held by most people who have never been in a life or death situation.  They believe that in an actual combat situation, they will be able to cleanly and distinctly make well thought out decisions about their self protection.  This is patently insane.  If you can make those well thought out decisions, it is not really a self defense situation, because your life was not on the line.  If it is a real self defense situation--defined by a criminal justice authority AFTER THE INCIDENT--then you do not have the time, luxury or even the capacity to make those decisions.  What Tim Larkin teaches is to use your body as a bullet, because in a real, justified, legal self defense situation, you would be perfectly justified in shooting the predator.  He simply teaches people how to use their body to apply that lethal force that a bullet applies for when you do not (for some reason) have a gun.

I once took a person shooting who said, "If I was attacked I would shoot the gun out of their hand."  I succeeded in not laughing in her face.  Do not carry a gun if you believe that is a possibility; if you ever find yourself in a self protection incident, it will be taken away from you by somebody with no conscience, and it will be used on you.  These idiots in the video do not understand what an actual self defense situation is.  They think it is a bar fight.  I have written previously about how most traditional martial arts are training people to bar fight, but calling it "self defense training."  Kickboxing competitions in a bar are really pointless, foolish and illegal.  That is not self defense.  As an aside, in an actual interpersonal combat situation, where somebody is trying to kill, rape or maim you, using those really cool Mixed Martial Arts skills that work so well against a single, unarmed opponent in a ring with a ref and rules, will guarantee your death.

What these people do not understand is that the only systems of unarmed self protection that are actually worth a darn, are things like Tim Larkin's Target Focus Training, because all they teach is how to kill and maim a violent predator.  You cannot negotiate with a lion trying to kill you.  You cannot Aikido its ass onto the ground and then think you can walk away.  If somebody is actually trying to kill, rape or maim you, you attack them with lethal force and the intent to kill them.  Maybe they get lucky and survive you emptying the cylinder of your revolver into their upper chest, but not because you were trying to "wound them."

Professional predators operate by ambush.  An ambush is confused chaos.  The confusion is terrifying, so much so that your cognitive brain shuts down.  When that happens, only your reptilian brain is functioning, and it will allow you to do only that which you have trained over and over again.  That means, if you train to shoot the high center chest of a silhouette, then that is what your body is going to do.  If you train to jab out someone's eyes with your thumbs if they grab you, then that is what your body is going to do.  If you train to try and put them in an arm bar--as cops and bouncers are trained and required to do--then that is what your body will do.  If you are not a cop or a bouncer, with backup, that last one will get you killed against a professional predator.  Why would you try to restrain somebody trying to stab, shoot, rape or mug you?  You do not have time to play around in an actual self defense situation--as determined by a criminal justice official AFTER THE INCIDENT--you only have time to react and do what you've been trained to do.  If you train to grab lions by the tail, you're going to lose, and you're going to lose huge.

There are some good systems of unarmed self protection out there, that teach using your body as a bullet.  There are some systems of martial arts that teach the right skills, but they teach you to do it in a bar fight and then go to jail.  Then there are some traditional systems of martial arts that teach grappling and kickboxing in life and death situations, and that is dangerous crap that will get you stabbed, shot or raped in a real self defense situation.  Do not make the mistake the Army did back in the 1990s and start training non-lethal MMA techniques for a lethal environment.  If you want to survive a life and death situation, you have to live and the bad guy has to meet death; that is combat.  If you are training to "wing 'em" then you are training to be a victim.  If you are training with the mindset that you will be able to think your way through an attempted murder or gunfight, you are--as the people in the video are--dangerously delusional.  It's over in under two seconds, the blood drains out of the frontal cortex of your brain as adrenaline floods your system and completely shuts down cognition.  If you haven't trained for it, you will freeze instead of fighting or fleeing.  It is absurd to think you will be able to make generous and pacifistic choices about just "disarming or disabling" your attacker in those circumstances.

Read Tim Larkin's book "When Violence is the Answer," and you will understand that the professional predators are not training in prison gangs for an MMA fight.  They are training to take what they want, and if you are a minor obstacle to them, they will simply kill you and then take what they want.  You have to be as lethal, as ruthless and as capable as they are if you want to survive a real self defense situation and not just beat up drunk idiots in bars.  Predators are not afraid of a sheep who knows Aikido.

Like and Share
Soule
Easy 6

Wednesday, August 8, 2018

The Problem of Denial

Modern American institutions of education and socialization produce one thing in greater numbers than any other profession: victims-in-waiting.  Our culture has become so Anti-Violent that when violence finds average citizens, they are completely unprepared for it.  I always look back at the time after World War Two when America was accustomed to violence and people knew how to protect themselves.  The uncomfortable truth that nobody likes discussing is that to survive a violent encounter with a professional predator, you cannot be civilized.  A true Self-Defense Situation, where somebody is trying to kill you, rob you, rape you or maim you, is not civilized.  In fact, I would define such acts of anti-social behavior as “the abandonment of the social contract that allows civilizations to function peacefully.”  When that contract is abandoned, behaving with civility is dangerously absurd.  The Greatest Generation understood this.  Their children, grandchildren and now great grandchildren, do not understand that the breach of a social contract means the rules are literally discarded.  This is contrary to any training, education or expectations most civilian members of the Baby Boomer, Generation X or Millennial generations have ever received.  They have not been well prepared to deal with behavior that is anti-social; anti-social (or sociopathic/psychopathic) behavior literally means behavior against the nature of society.  Professional predators exist purely outside of the nature of civilized society.  The effect of this is that the majorities of three generations of Americans have no concept how to react to, or survive, situations that suddenly abandon the rules of civilized society and turn violent. 
               The so-called “self-defense” industry does not have a very good answer for this problem, either.  This is why they teach bar fighting (as discussed here), because that is physical violence within the arena of a social construct, and they don’t have to address this problem within the mentality of three generations of customers.  A situation which is actually adjudicated by a criminal justice official as Self-Defense does not exist in an arena of a social construct.  A true Self-Defense Situation exists in the arena of anarchy—or combat—which are really the same thing because anarchy will inevitably lead to combat.  Anarchy is the absence of the social contract, any social construct or any civilizing norms to control violent behavior.  Preparing people to survive an encounter in that environment requires overcoming generations of pacifistic socialization in America.  Socialization defined in the true sense—adapting a person to life in a society—which indoctrinates them to expect rules, constraints and protection from anarchy.  How do we overcome that socialization?
               This is the biggest challenge facing those who teach self-protection, in which definition I am including every combat veteran and every cop who has ever been in a gunfight, because I believe to overcome the socialization of victimhood in America, every cop and veteran has to be an instructor in this mentality.  The American Army has traditionally had a very good system for overcoming that socialization; they use the veterans of the previous war to train the recruits for the new war.  And they train them as brutally as possible to prepare them for the absence of civilization one finds on a battlefield.  But, how do you replicate that for the civilian world?  People who have been victims of anti-social behavior do not need convincing of the threat, and they are frequent enrollees in self-protection training; but how do we convince the potential victims of the need to train to survive in moments of anarchy?
               This is not something that can be trained easily outside of the military system, where there is no quitting, and the instructor literally owns your body.  It is not a skill that can be taught, in other words.  We can teach people how to fight, how to shoot, how to be aggressive and how to win, but only if they accept the necessity of learning those skills.  To accept the necessity of learning how to kill a person with a screwdriver in an alley, one has to first believe and accept that the alley is potentially in a state of anarchy.  That flies in the face of all the socialization, all of the systems of government and all of the psychological defense mechanisms built up inside every modern American to protect their “inner child” from the truth.  The truth is that somebody who is a productive, functioning member of a society is also a victim-in-waiting for when that society—rules, codes, laws, morals, norms, commandments, canons and standards of behavior—disappears in a dark alley behind the barrel of a Saturday Night Special.  Acceptance of that truth is very difficult absent experience in anarchy.  But acceptance of that truth is a prerequisite to any effective training in self-protection.
               We can teach people to punch, kick, shoot and even win in a controlled competition with the rules, codes, morals, norms, commandments, canons and standards of behavior associated with a society that loves bloody sports.  But nobody can convince somebody else that her life may be in danger if she walks down that alley; for her to accept the truth, she has to accept the possibility that the rules of the social contract can be discarded, and that is a scary reality to live in for most people.  But, once a person accepts that truth, then he becomes very committed to learning the skills necessary to survive such anarchy long enough to get out and back to the social contract.  Acceptance of the dangerous nature of the world, and recognition of the tissue-paper-thin and flimsy nature of the social contract, cannot be learned from a lecturer.  It has to either come from one’s socialization early in life—being raised by a combat veteran for example—or come from a moment of clarity about that flimsy nature of the social contract.  Tragically, most times that moment of clarity comes after the façade of civilization is shattered and the person becomes a victim.  What I want is for every American to accept the truth about such dangers before a professional predator drags you into anarchy as a victim.  If you do that, then you will never be a victim; you may lose in combat, but it’s not because you will be helpless, like a victim.
               Each student has to believe that the façade of civility, civilized behavior and civilization itself can be snuffed out—as happened in New Orleans during Hurricane Katrina—with very little effort from the anarchy-loving and entropy-driving universe.  The fact is every successful violent crime is against a person who believed it could never happen to them; every foiled violent crime is attempted against somebody who understands that it could and they prepared for it.  The only way to be the latter instead of the former is to accept into your belief system the fragility of civility, and then train to survive the moments of anarchy that follow its collapse.  If you change your mentality, any combat vet or gunfighter cop can teach you the skills you need to survive those moments.  But if you don’t change your world view to acceptance—instead of denial—of the dangerous world we live in, then studying the skills for decades will not prepare you for anti-social predators and you will still be a just another victim-in-waiting.
Step 1: Stop being Cleopatra, Queen of Denial.  Accept that the world is a dangerous place.
Step 2: Get more dangerous than the world.

Saturday, July 28, 2018

Paranoia vs. Preparation

Great Little Self-Protection Tool
Recently had a conversation with a friend of mine concerned about the safety of his teenage daughter going to college.  She takes some unnecessary risks according to my friend, like walking alone across campus in periods of low-light.  I recommended my solution to such a problem: a two-dollar flat head screwdriver held upside down on the inside of the wrist inside a sleeve.  He did not like that idea, because it would cause her to constantly worry about it.
“I don’t want to make her paranoid,” he said.  “I don’t live my life constantly worrying about danger, and I don’t want her to have to live that way.”
My response was that if you are prepared, you don’t have to be paranoid.  I also told him that nobody is jumping out of the bushes to grab six-foot-four, two-hundred and fifty pound, middle-aged Marines like him.  Teenage girls on a college campus do need to be a little paranoid.  Not paranoid to the point that it debilitates a person or prevents them from living the life they want, but paranoid enough to be aware of surroundings using all five senses in concert.  Using all five senses at once does two things: 1) It causes your mind to become present-focused as it is impossible to remember or future-fantasize with all five senses; 2) it activates the so-called “sixth” sense, which is really just intuition about when a situation is potentially dangerous and should be left or avoided.
Situational Awareness is often talked about, but not fully understood.  It can be the deciding factor in a self-defense situation if it is utilized correctly.  Utilizing Situational Awareness correctly means you never get into a self-defense situation at all.  When you have a high level of Situational Awareness, and you trust your intuition—being informed by all five of your senses—then you can survive the ambush by never getting into it.  The best way to survive any self-defense situation is to listen when your sixth sense, your gut, your “spidey sense,” your women’s intuition, et cetera tells you to GTFO (Get The F--- Out).  That is the master level utilization of Situational Awareness.
By contrast, being aware of an ambush and still walking into it, while better than being caught unaware, is not the best use of Situational Awareness.  In the military, in war, sometimes you can’t avoid a combat engagement because you still have to accomplish a mission, or because you have orders, or whatever.  But, in the civilian self-defense world, if you knowingly walk into a combat situation, you are an idiot.  Or, if you are in a place and you start feeling a really bad vibe like something is about to go down, and you do not trust your gut, you have made yourself a victim.  Situational Awareness is not a tool to allow you to be irresponsible with your own life.  I have a pretty high level of Situational Awareness, especially in unfamiliar or riskier surroundings, but the intuition is only as good as the trust you have in it.
Situational Awareness should lead to one of two actions: 1) GTFO because you trust your instincts, or 2) you increase your readiness for combat.  Being aware you're about to get jumped does you no good if you don’t take the steps necessary to defeat the ambush in advance.  In other words, when my intuition starts telling me something is going bad, that is the time that I put my hand on the weapon, or if it’s the knife/screwdriver up my sleeve I get it into the grip I want and take it outside of the sleeve.  I might shift my walk/stance. 
“I have Situational Awareness, so I’m safe…even though I don’t have a gun, a knife, a screwdriver or running shoes and I can’t fight my way out of a wet paper bag…”
Situational Awareness is awesome, but it is not a panacea for self-defense because it is not how engagements are won.  Let me put it another way: spies don’t win wars; fighters do.  Now, some spies are also fighters, but my point is that information about the enemy, by itself, does not defeat the enemy.  You still have to have the capacity to inflict damage on the enemy.  Having every square inch of your yard covered by security cameras is useless if you don’t have the capacity to do anything to somebody trying to come in and hurt you.  The cameras are great Situational Awareness, which massively increase information and knowledge about the enemy, but if he’s “got the pistol, he’ll keep the pesos” unless you have a capacity to utilize the information.  Intelligence (Situational Awareness) by itself is only useful if you can use it to avoid an engagement; if you can’t avoid the engagement then Situational Awareness is far less important than the capabilities necessary to defeat the opponent.  It is not a panacea for self-defense; it is a tool for the preparation for self-defense situations.  Properly used, it gets you away from dangerous situations without ever being engaged.  If that’s not possible, then it eliminates the confusion of an ambush (which is the real danger), and it allows you to regain Initiative.  But, it does nothing for you if you do not trust the intuition it informs, or if you do not prepare yourself with the capabilities to do violence.

Soule
Easy 6
www.easy6training.com

Saturday, July 7, 2018

Self-Defense vs. Traditional Martial Arts vs. Self-Protection Systems vs. The Only Art that Matters

Intro: Martial arts are not Self-Defense, and Self-Defense has almost nothing to do with martial arts.  The lie that the consumer has been told for the last fifty years is that the two words are synonymous.  In truth, “Self-Defense” is not a system of physical actions one takes to protect oneself. Actually, Self-Defense is a legal determination—from a criminal justice official—after a physical confrontation occurs (Tim Larkin, When Violence is the Answer).  If it was a real Self-Defense situation, where the person was protecting self from murder/rape/stabbing/home invasion/carjacking, then whatever actions were taken in self-protection would be construed as justified by the legal system.  That is Self-Defense, it is a plea in a court, a determination by a cop, or a finding by a prosecutor/judge/jury of a justified use of force in protecting self. 

1) Self-Defense is not a barfight. If you mortally wound or maim somebody in a barfight, you will go to prison.  Barfights are not Self-Defense, and yet traditional martial arts teach nothing but how to win in barfights, and then they call it “reality-based street self-defense training.”  It is NOT Self-Defense; barfights are “duels;” two drunk gorillas pounding their chests for social dominance.  When somebody is yelling “MotherF-er!” at you for five minutes before anybody takes a swing, that is not real, justified Self-Defense.  There is no legal justification for killing drunk idiots in bars with a gun, and we all understand that, but the martial arts community would tell you that permanently maiming somebody by stomping their head into a barroom floor is perfectly justified because “he threw the first punch.”  That idiotic idea will land you in jail.  There is NOTHING in a bar worth fighting over, because nobody ever wins.  Somebody gets hurt—usually both parties—and somebody goes to jail—often both parties—regardless of who “wins” or “loses” the altercation. 

2) Real Self-Defense means that if you had a gun or a knife, you would have been perfectly justified in using it because your life/body was truly in danger; it is combat at the interpersonal level.  Thus, when unarmed and confronted with such a threat, you must make your body a bullet—or a blade—and maim or kill the assailant by attacking vulnerable parts of their body.  Kickboxing the face and ribs or grappling on the ground may win in a cage fight, but in real unarmed combat it takes too long.  In real unarmed combat, you want your body to cause the same trauma to the enemy that a knife or bullet would if you had one; you attack the eyes, the throat, the spine and the brain to replicate such wounds.  You cause enough Damage to the assailant to allow escape, or to get to a better weapon and use it on him, because there is no “fair fight” in real Self-Defense.  If you would not be justified stabbing somebody to death, then it is not actually a Self-Defense situation; it’s just a barfight or a competition. 

3) Therefore, I never get into fist fights, because none of them are necessary to me.  I am always armed, so if it is real Self-Defense, why wouldn’t I just shoot/stab/run over the assailant?  There are only two kinds of physical confrontations: justified Self-Defense and unjustified “fights” or “duels” for illegitimate reasons (like impressing women, or because somebody spilled a drink on somebody else).  In the first kind, you are always justified in using a weapon to prevent your death or grievous bodily harm (unless you live in one of the insane places like Maryland, New York or the U.K.), so why get into a fist fight at all?  There is never a reason to get into a fist fight if you are armed, and if you are in a situation where you can’t take a gun or knife (like an airplane), then use an improvised weapon to get you to a better weapon that you can use to kill or neutralize the threat.  So, I just don’t see the need to get into fist fights; if I am justified in defending myself it means my life is actually at risk, in which case I am going to use the most lethal tool I have and use my bare hands only as a means to get me to a lethal tool.  If you adopt this outlook that you are going to kill any real threat to your person or loved ones, then actually your life becomes a lot more civil and peaceful, because you ignore the social slights and fake “self-defense” situations that most martial arts train you to defeat.   

4) Tom Clancy once wrote, “The first rule of unarmed combat is: Don’t Get Into It!”  Unarmed combat is never the goal, but it may be a transitional step to getting to a weapon.  But, traditional martial arts like to teach that “Self-Defense” is nothing more than winning fist fights by being a better puncher/kicker/grappler.  In truth, the whole goal of unarmed combat is not to win, it is to get out of the predicament of being unarmed.  To that end, there are some non-traditional self-protection systems that are useful for making your body into a weapon of last resort.  Their utility is two-fold: first, the biological utility in learning to strike from many different parts of the body other than just fists and learning mechanics of how the human body moves and doesn’t move (breaks).  Secondly, these non-traditional self-protection systems emphasize being armed.  Have a weapon; if you don’t have a weapon then find one; if you can’t find a weapon then make one.  Only as an absolute last resort should you use your body as the weapon, and then only in the pursuit of getting a better weapon.  Traditional martial arts do not teach this principle because they do not believe in this principle; they have been lied to for centuries about the effectiveness of their arts in killing people.  Do not buy the b.s. about some system being the “world’s deadliest martial art,” or “the most realistic self-defense system ever.”  Don’t believe hype or propaganda claiming the ability to disarm anybody, beat anybody or survive any threat because they evolved from some thousand-year-old style of taking spears away from guys in armor. 

5) The goal of all the other unarmed self-protection activity I might engage in during a violent encounter is ultimately designed for one purpose: to get my hands on a gun to eliminate the threat. Therefore, the only martial art that matters to me any longer is shooting.  Yes, shooting is a martial art (a “war skill”).  Just like fencing was a martial art for swords, and warriors of the Renaissance understood that to get good at using their tool they needed to train and practice with it.  Firearms are simply the modern version of swords.  Therefore, I train with the pistol like Musketeers trained with their rapiers.  The skill and the tool combined is what made the Musketeers effective in combat, and so must the modern concealed carrier be efficient and effective in using his version of the rapier.  So, we have to train, and not just for marksmanship but for gunfighting.  I think the most dangerous person on the planet is somebody with a concealed carry pistol who has not gone to a range and practiced with it in years.  That is somebody who will end up arming a bad guy, because he will be useless with the tool when the time comes to use it, and he will have it taken away from him.  To prevent that, some empty hand skills are needed to “fight to the gun, fight for the gun in order to fight with the gun.”  That should be the focus of a good unarmed fighting system (getting armed), and the system should apply the same principles to shooting as it does to unarmed combat: 
1. Get the Initiative away from the attacker: become the aggressor, make the bad guy retreat. 
2. Cause traumatic Damage, not just intimidation or peripheral pain: shoot/fight to end threats. 
3. Maintain Situational Awareness: don’t get ambushed. 
4. If you do get ambushed, be mentally prepared to kill to protect yourself: don’t freeze! 
5. The first rule of unarmed combat: don’t get into it!  If you are in it, get to a weapon fast!

Sunday, July 1, 2018

Lessons from the Annapolis Shooting

Another mass shooting, another blog.  The cops got there in 60 seconds.  By then, five people were mortally wounded, two others shot.  This by a guy who was deliberately targeting people rather than just randomly killing anybody.  This bears out other research that says mass shooters hit somebody about every 8 seconds.  Meaning, unless you are a plain-clothed cop standing next to the first victim, relying on the police to stop a mass shooter does not work for the second--et sequentia--victims.

https://kyrieosity.files.wordpress.com/2013/08/lion_porcupine.jpg
Predator vs. Armed Prey
Honestly, carrying a gun does not guarantee your safety in a mass shooting.  Nor does not carrying a gun guarantee you will be a victim.  But let's say carrying a gun increases your survival chances by one percent.  Is your life worth that one percent better chance?

Unfortunately, what the politicians on both the left and right in modern America argue about are false guarantees of safety.  There are no guarantees in combat, and as I have said many times, real self-defense engagements are combat on an interpersonal level.  It's the scene in Saving Private Ryan where Private Mellish is killed with a knife by the German.  There are no guarantees, because the enemy gets a vote in the outcome of the struggle.  Guarantees and promises are what Americans want from their politicians, and giving such guarantees is how politicians get elected.  But, that's a lie.  There are no guarantees when it comes to violence.  There are only probabilities, and you can increase your odds of winning by doing certain things, but there is still no 100% solution in combat.

The most important thing you can do to increase your chances of survival is equipping yourself to be able to confront violence.  In other words, you have to have the physical capabilities to be violent if you are confronted with violence.  That means arming yourself.  I advocate carrying a firearm, but if that's not possible, then remember the first WIDTH-6 principle: anything can be used as a weapon, because you are the weapon.  There are fire extinguishers in most indoor work settings; ambush the bastard upside the head with one.  Get a kitchen knife from the break room, and turn his neck into a red sprinkler.  Or, be like me, and shoot back.

The other thing you need to do to prepare yourself is train.  Train as much as you can.  For me that means shooting as often as I can.  If you're in a place where you can't carry a gun, then train for unarmed combat; that is not the same as training for a fight.  Unarmed combat is not a boxing match or MMA competition; it is trying to neutralize the other person's ability to kill you before they have a chance to do so.  That means taking the Initiative away from them and causing Damage (not pain) to a structure of their body in order to kill or completely incapacitate them.  In other words, cheat your ass off and be brutal; if you're not cheating, you're not in a real self-defense situation.

The most important aspect of training and equipping yourself to confront violence is not physical, it is mental preparation to do violence onto another person.  This should inform your decisions for equipping yourself in that you want a weapon that you can handle to actually inflict lethal damage upon another person, not just threaten it (never rely on intimidation against crazy people).  It should also inform your training methodology.  Training to win a grappling contest in a ring will not solve an active shooter problem.  Neither will training to put holes in bullseyes in a sterile indoor shooting range.  Mental training has to be training the mind to kill.  The mind is I, and I am the Weapon.

Train to flee also.  Understand where the exits are.  Understand how to get out of an active shooter situation.  Rehearse escape routes.  Rehearse getting to safety, not just outside the building.  Rick Rescorla, who was the hero security manager for Morgan Stanley in the South Tower of the World Trade Center, forced his entire company to do evacuation drills.  On September 11, 2001, he saved all of his employees but one idiot Vice President, who refused to leave, and Mr. Rescorla died going back in for the idiot when the tower collapsed.  It was his preparation, learned in Vietnam, that saved hundreds of lives.  He taught them how to get out, and to not stop once they got out.  These simple rehearsals that he ran made the difference between his company's survival and the fates of so many others in the World Trade Center.  Know how to get out of your work space, always know where you are in any space, and know the most expedient means of escape.  When you are traveling and check into a hotel, find the nearest emergency exits and just take a walk down to them.  These little rehearsals save lives, and they are all part of training to survive an active shooter.

There are no guarantees in combat because the enemy gets a vote.  Don't trust any politician, on the left or right, that promises to "make you safer."  They can't.  You have to make yourself safer.  Be the Weapon.  Retake the Initiative to save your own life.  If confronted with evil, cause mortal Damage.  Trust your Sixth Sense and maintain situational awareness.  Be mentally prepared to save your own life, because even when the cops are only 60 seconds away, that's too long.

Like and Share,
Soule
Easy6
www.easy6training.com

Checking your Easy 6th Sense

Easy 6 was my radio call sign in Iraq.  Lots of my students ask what it stands for and why I call the company Easy 6 Training.  They ask if there are six easy things to remember to be a better armed self-defense shooter.  I have always had the five W.I.D.T.H. principles, of which I have written extensively.  But, briefly, W is for Weapon: 1) I am the weapon, not the gun/knife/sledge hammer, thus 2) anything can be used as a weapon from a rock to B2 bomber.  I is for Initiative: Combat is a battle for initiative, whoever has it at the end of an engagement is the winner, thus retaking the initiative from an attacker is the most important aspect of winning.  D is for Damage: do not try to cause pain, try to cause damage; shoot for the high center chest, punch for the trachea, stab for the jugular.  T is for Torque: use mass and circular motion to defeat smaller mass and fragile structures.  H is for Head (and Neck): use Torque on the Head to break lethal structures (Damage), target the Head to shut down the central processor of an enemy (Damage). 

Then I got to thinking about situational awareness.  Fighter pilots call it "checking your six o'clock" to make sure nothing is behind you.  I used to include checking your six in Torque, or circular motion to ensure nobody was sneaking up on you.  In fire team tactics, we use 360 degree security to ensure the six is always covered.  But there is more to situational awareness than just checking your six.  It is using all five of your senses in order to increase your sixth sense.  There was research in Vietnam about guys that survived ambushes because their "sixth sense" told them about the danger before the ambush was launched.  That is true situational awareness.  Being attuned to your environment, so you can feel when something is not right or a threat.  Listen to your instincts, to your sixth sense.

I tell a story in my classes about when I did not listen to my sixth sense.  It was my first week of my first tour in Iraq, and I was a new guy.  We were driving by another Forward Operating Base (FOB) and there was a white van parked across the road from the gate.  Something didn't feel right to me, but I didn't want to look like the paranoid F---ing New Guy, so I didn't say anything.  A couple hours later, the gate guards came out and found the van was loaded with high explosives, and they planned to ram it into the gate later that night and get inside the FOB perimeter.  Fortunately, no Americans were hurt, but it taught me a vital lesson about trusting my sixth sense.  Embarrassment is a small price to pay for staying alive.  Learn to trust that "Spidey Sense" when something does not seem normal.  Maybe it means you put the knife up your sleeve, maybe it means you put the gun in your hand, maybe it means you just get out of that situation, but trust it.

So, there it is, six easy things to make you a better self-defender: Weapon, Initiative, Damage, Torque, Head and Sixth Sense: WIDTH-6.  This one was short, because I have another I am working on about lessons from the Annapolis Shooting.

Like and Share,
Soule
Easy 6
www.easy6training.com

Like and Share,
Soule
Easy 6
www.easy6training.com